SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Anandbhai Mansukhbhai Hathila – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pratik B Barot, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. C.M. Shah, APP

ORDER

Ms. Bela M. Trivedi, J.—Heard learned Advocates for the parties.

2. Rule. Learned APP Ms. C. M. Shah waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of Respondent-State.

3. Present application has been filed by the applicant- convict seeking suspension of his sentence under section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with the judgment and order dated 19.02.2020 passed by the Special Judge and 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Dahod (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Special Court’) in Special (POCSO) Case No.55 of 2016, whereby the applicant-convict has been convicted for the offences punishable under sections 376(N) of the IPC and under sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offcenes Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years for the offence under section 376(N) of the IPC and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default thereto to undergo further imprisonment for a period of one year and undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years for the offences under sections 3 and 4 of the said Act and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default thereto to undergo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top