SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Revati Mohite Dere, J.
Santosh Mahadev Atkar – Appellant
versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.544 of 2019
Decided on 2.2.2021

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sarang Aradhye, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P.

IMPORTANT POINT
Wife is not a chattel or an object. Marriage ideally is a partnership based on equality.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 304, Part II and 201 – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder and disappearance of evidence – Common intention – Conviction and sentence – Deceased was wife of appellant – Appellant was suspecting his wife’s character and would assault her on account of same – On the day of incident on being refused tea, appellant assaulted deceased with a hammer – Deceased, by refusing to make tea for appellant, by no stretch of imagination, can be said to have offered grave and sudden provocation for appellant to assault her, much less, such a brutal assault – Wife is not a chattel or an object – Marriage ideally is a partnership based on equality – Emotional labour in a marriage is also expected to be done by wife – Coupled with these imbalances in equation, is imbalance of expectation and subjugation – Social conditions of women also make them handover themselves to their spouses – Appellant not only assaulted his wife, but also after assaulting her, wasted precious and crucial time i.e. around one hour, in covering his act by destroying evidence, by wiping blood from spot and bathing her before taking her to hospital – If appellant had rushed her to hospital, soon after incident, possibly her life could have been saved – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 15, 16 and 17)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Revati Mohite Dere, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellant has impugned the judgment and order dated 1st July 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur in Sessions Case No. 13/2014, convicting and sentencing the appellant as under :

- for the offence punishable under 304, Part II of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for 6 months;

- for the offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months.

Both the aforesaid sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. A few facts as are necessary to decide the case are as under :

The appellant is the husband, who was married to Manisha (deceased) on 15th December 2005. From the said wedlock, the appellant and Manisha were blessed with a daughter-Rohini. The appellant and Manisha were residing in the Servants’ Quarters of Vitthal Hospital at Pandharpur along with the appellant’s mother, who was serving in the said Hospital. According to the prosecution, the appellant was suspecting Manisha’s character, as a result of which, there used to be frequent quarrels between them. The incident is stated to have taken place on 19th December 2013 at about 6:00 a.m. It is the prosecution case that Manisha was leaving the house on the said date and time, without preparing tea, on account of which, there was exchange of words between the appellant and deceased-Manisha. As the appellant was suspecting Manisha’s character and as she refused to make tea for the appellant, the appellant is alleged to have given a blow on Manisha’s head from behind, with a hammer. The said incident is alleged to have been witnessed by Rohini (appellant and Manisha’s daughter), who, at the relevant time, was aged 6 years. It is the prosecution case that soon after Manisha was assaulted, the appellant gave her a bath, wiped the blood-stains from the spot and thereafter took Manisha to Vitthal Hospital. As Manisha’s condition was critical, the doctor who treated Manisha asked the appellant to shift Manisha to the Civil Hospital, Solapur. Pursuant thereto, Manisha was shifted to the Civil Hospital, Solapur. Throughout, Manisha’s condition was critical and she was unable to speak and eventually on 25th December 2013, Manisha succumbed to her injury.

In the meantime, i.e. on 19th December 2013, Manisha’s uncle-Macchindra Waghmare (PW 4), on learning that Manisha was admitted to the hospital, immediately rushed to the hospital i.e. Vitthal Hospital, where the appellant informed Macchindra that he had assaulted Manisha. Pursuant thereto, Macchindra Waghmare (PW 4) lodged a complaint with the Pandharpur Police Station. On registration of the FIR, investigation commenced, statements of witnesses were recorded, panchanamas were drawn and after investigation, charge-sheet was filed as against the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, in the Court of the learned Magistrate at Pandharpur.

The said offence being Sessions triable, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions at Pandharpur. Charge was framed against the appellant for the aforesaid offence, to which, the appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution, in support of its case, examined 12 witnesses. Thereafter, Section 313 statement of the appellant was recorded. The learned Judge, after hearing the parties, was pleased to convict the appellant for the offence as stated in para 2 hereinabove.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant assailed the judgment on several counts. He submitted that the prosecution case essentially rests on extra-judicial confession made by the appellant to PW 4-Macchindra Waghmare; PW 6-Nandabai Waghmare and PW 7-Dr. Bajrang

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top