SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SADHANA S.JADHAV, N.R.BORKAR
Ragini Goma Bhoir – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate
For the State: Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP

JUDGMENT

N.R. Borkar, J.—This appeal takes an exception to the Judgment and order dated 30th April, 2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibaug, in Sessions Case No.102 of 2012. By the impugned Judgment and order, the appellants who were accused Nos.1 and 2 before the trial Court have been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for life and to pay fine of R.5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to suffer R.I. for 6 months.

2. The deceased Rekha was the wife of PW 1 Laxman Motiram Bhoir. Accused No.2 is the elder brother of PW 1 and accused No.1 is the wife of accused No.2. At the relevant time, the deceased and accused were residing in the same building at Village Kopara, Taluka – Panvel, District Raigad. PW 1 and his wife were residing on first floor and the accused were residing on the second floor. Parents of PW 1 and accused No.2 were residing on ground floor. There was only one water tap connection for the entire building.

3. The incident took place on 28th November, 2011. On the day of incident, in the morning hours at about 9.15 a.m. a quarrel took place between the accuse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top