SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.ANAND VENKATESH
A. Radhika – Appellant
Versus
Wilson Sundararaj – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V. Lakshmi Narayanan for Mr. K.P. Anantha Krishna
For the Respondent:Mr. B.R. Shankaralingam, Advocate

ORDER

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.—This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the summons issued by the Court below directing the Petitioner to attend an enquiry initiated by the court below based on the complaint given by the Respondent under Section 340 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”).

2. The Respondent who was arrayed as A3 in S.C. No. 123 of 2005 before the Additional District and Sessions Court, FTC III, Chennai, faced trial along with 3 other accused persons for an offence under Sections 120B, 307, 450, 451, 384, 506-Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “I.P.C”) read with Section 109, I.P.C. The FIR in this case was registered in Crime No. 473 of 2002 by the F-2 Police Station, Egmore and later on the investigation was transferred to the file of the CBCID. The Petitioner who was then the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID was assigned the task of investigating the case. It was based on the final report filed by the Petitioner, the accused persons faced the trial before the concerned court.

3. The trial court on appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence and after considering

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top