SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AKIL KURESHI, S.G.CHATTOPADHYAY
Bhaskar Deb – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: In person
For the Respondents: Mr. Debalay Bhattacharjee, GA

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has raised an issue of the State Police authorities not following the mandate of Section 173 (2) (ii) of Cr.P.C. in large number of cases. The petitioner has raised an issue in public interest exhibiting no personal interest in the same.

2. Section 173 of Cr.P.C., pertains to report of police officer on completion of investigation. Sub-Section (1) of Section 173 provides that every investigation under the Chapter XII shall be completed without unnecessary delay. Clause (i) of sub-Section (2) of Section 173 provides that as soon as it is completed, the officer-in-charge of the police station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report, a report in the form prescribed by the State Government stating various details as provided in sub-clauses (a) to (h) of the said clause. Clause (ii) of sub-Section (2) further provides that the officer shall also communicate, in such manner as may be prescribed by the State Government, the action taken by him to the person, if any, by whom the information relating to the commission of the offence was first given.

3. In plain terms thus as per Section 173 (2) (ii) upon completion

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top