SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BIRENDRA KUMAR
Arjun Kumar @ Prince – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, and Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Bipin Kumar, APP.

JUDGMENT (C.A.V.)

Birendra Kumar, J.—The sole appellant Arjun Kumar @ Prince faced trial in POCSO Case No. 06 of 2016 arising out of Dumrao P.S. Case No. 396 of 2015 for offence under Sections 363, 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code as well as 4 of the POCSO Act. By the impugned judgment dated 13.11.2017, the learned trial Judged found guilty and convicted to the appellant for offences under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the POCSO Act. By the impugned order of sentence dated 17.11.2017, the appellant was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- for offence under Section 366A IPC. Three months imprisonment was ordered for non-payment of the fine aforesaid. For the offence under Section 376 IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/-. In default of payment of fine, three months imprisonment was ordered. No separate sentence under Section 4 of the POCSO Act was passed considering the provisions of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.

2. The prosecution case as disclosed in the written report of Pushpa Devi (PW-3) the mother of the victim girl, i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top