SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Rajesh Soni – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.K. Gwalare, Advocate

Judgement Key Points

No, the provided legal document does not indicate that this judgment has been appealed.

This is a final order of the Chhattisgarh High Court in Cr. M.P. No. 562 of 2021, dated 30.6.2021, dismissing the petitioner's challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to the lower courts' orders directing interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. (!) (!) [5000302970002][5000302970005][5000302970020] (!)

The document details the procedural history (Magistrate's order dated 24.12.2019 and Sessions Judge's order dated 06.03.2021 rejecting revision) but contains no reference to any appeal, further proceedings, stay, or Supreme Court involvement against this High Court judgment. The order concludes with dismissal and "No order as to costs," marking it as a terminal disposition in the described proceedings. (!) [5000302970004][5000302970005][5000302970019][5000302970020] (!)


ORDER (CAV)

Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.—The petitioner has filed present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 24.12.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur (C.G.) in Complaint Case No. 1777/2019 wherein learned trial court has allowed the application filed by the complainant under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short “the Act, 1881”) and has directed the petitioner to pay 20% of the cheque amount, as well as order dated 06.03.2021 passed by 11th Additional Sessions Judge Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) by which the criminal revision filed by the petitioner has been rejected.

2. The brief facts, as projected by the petitioner, are that complainant/ respondent has filed complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 on 09.01.2019 before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) mainly contending that the petitioner had given a cheque dated 26.11.2018 amounting to Rs. 6,50,000/- to the complainant. The complainant has deposited the cheque on 28.11.2018 in the account maintained by him in Central Bank of India, Branch- Chhattisgarh College, Raipur. The said cheque was dishono

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top