SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Paresh Upadhyay, J.
Hashumatiben Wd/o Shravanbhai
Amjibhai Makwana – Petitioner
versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Special Criminal Application No.6224 of 2021
Decided on 6.7.2021

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr Amit N Chaudhary, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr Hardik Soni, APP

IMPORTANT POINT
Order of externment passed against a lady can be stayed by Court to meet ends of justice.

Headnote:

Gujarat Police Act, 1951 – Section 56(a) – Externment order – State need to respond, on the basis of the stakes involved in the matter, how State visualizes the lady to earn her livelihood, from being away from her home for six months, most of which has passed by this time – Having considered totality and material on record, ends of justice would meet if further execution and implementation of externment order is suspended – Further implementation and execution of impugned externment order shall remain stayed, until further orders. (Paras 5, 6 and 7)

Result: Special Criminal Application allowed.

ORDER (ORAL)

Paresh Upadhyay, J.—Challenge in this petition is made to the order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bharuch dated 23.02.2021 whereby the present petitioner is externed for a period of six months from the District of Bharuch. The said order is stated to have been passed in exercise of powers under Section 56(a) of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondents.

3. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent Authorities.

4. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a widow and if the quantity of liquor referred to in the FIRs in question is looked at, most of the FIRs are for 3/4 liters.

5. This Court has considered the contents of the impugned order dated 23.02.2021. The State need to respond, on the basis of the stakes involved in the matter, how State visualizes the lady to earn her livelihood, from being away from her home for six months, most of which has passed by this time.

6. Having heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the respondent Authorities and having considered the totality and the material on record, this Court finds that ends of justice would meet if the further execution and implementation of the externment order is suspended.

7. In view of above, it is ordered that further implementation and execution of the impugned externment order shall remain stayed, untill further orders.

8. List on 06.08.2021.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top