SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.J.MUNIR
Manav Sharma @ Manish Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Rajesh Kumar Verma, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: G.A.

JUDGMENT

J.J. Munir, J.—This is an application for bail on behalf of the applicant Manav Sharma @ Manish Sharma in connection with Case Crime No. 20 of 2021, under Sections 376(1), 506 I.P.C. and Section 67-A Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, Police Station Dhoomanganj, District Prayagraj.

2. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.S.Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

3. It has been emphatically made out by Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma on behalf of the applicant that it is a case where the applicant and the prosecutrix were into a long relationship and after she went away to Russia in connection with her higher education, she disowned the relationship. He submits that the present prosecution is a move on the part of the prosecutrix and her family to put a curtain on the past relationship between the parties. He submits that for the present, the applicant has in no way threatened her or posted any offensive or intimate photographs or photographs of hers on the internet or the facebook. He has in no way brought pressure upon the prosecutrix or her family to force her into matrimony. It is submitted that the other allegations ch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top