SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Binay Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. A.K. Kashyap, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in both the cases.

2. Heard Mr. Ashish Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-complainant in both the cases.

3. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party State in Cr. Revision No. 830 of 2012.

4. Heard Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party State in Cr. Revision No. 833 of 2012.

5. The complainant and the accused in both the cases are same persons. The appellate court judgements in both the cases are dated 29.06.2012 and have been passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-III, Ranchi and the appeals have been dismissed. The trial court judgement in Cr. Revision No. 830 /2012 is dated 05.08.2011 and in Cr. Revision No. 833 /2012 is dated 18.08.2011 both passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi. The essential details in connection with the impugned judgements are as under: -

Criminal Revision No.830 of 2012 ari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top