SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Ramashish Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Gaurang Chatterjee and Mr. Nilanjal Chatterjee, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, APP

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Gaurang Chatterjee, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 07.02.2015 and the consequent order of sentence dated 12.02.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No. 275 of 2011/70 of 2014 by which he has convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the IPC (for short ‘IPC’) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.

3. Surprisingly, after convicting the appellant on charges under two heads, the Trial Court vide impugned order dated 12.02.2015, passed a composite sentence without specifying the offence for which it was sentencing the convict.

4. The operative part of the order dated 12.02.2015 passed by the Trial Court reads as under: -

“On perusal of the case record and taking into consideration the contention of both the parties, it appears that the case is of dowry death and the deceased is subjected to cruelty. Thus, considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, the convic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top