SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, RAJESH KUMAR
Arti @ Aarti @ Sukar Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Birendra Kumar and Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Shekhar Sinha, P.P.

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Shekhar Sinha, learned P.P. for the State.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.07.2015 (sentence passed on 31.07.2015) passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Lohardaga in Sessions Trial No. 44 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of I.P.C. and have been sentenced to undergo S.I. for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the offence under Section 302/34 of I.P.C. No separate sentence has been passed for the offence under Section 201/34 of I.P.C.

3. The prosecution story arising out of an FIR instituted by Jairam Munda is to the effect that the son of the informant had gone to his in-laws’ place on 05.02.2013 at village Panchpadwa in the district of Lohardaga. On 06.02.2013 at about 8 AM, he came to know that his son has been murdered by Boda Munda @ Suman Munda, Birsa Munda @ Runka Munda, Jama Munda @ Sushil Munda and Arti Kumari @ Sukar Kumari. At this he along with his another son reached Panchpadwa, where he found his son having been murdered and thrown at P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top