JUDGMENT

Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Senior Advocate, along with Mr. Anurag Kashyap, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. The present application is directed against the order dated 09.02.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, II nd, Garhwa in connection with S.T. No. 61 of 2010 arising out of Dhurki P.S. Case No. 12 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 156 of 2007 registered under Sections 364/120-B of Indian Penal Code whereby the petition filed by the petitioner for his discharge has been rejected.

Arguments on behalf of the petitioner

4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner further submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the principal of the school, had permitted one call to be received by the victim boy (age 13 years) saying that the phone call was of his maternal uncle (mama), pursuant to which the victim boy had left the school and went to his house and thereafter, proceeded further. The learned Senior counsel submits that apart from this, there is no