SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.SHINDE, N.J.JAMADAR
Nilesh Bansilal Gaywal @ Ghaywal – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Mr. Sumant Deshpande
For the Respondent: Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP

JUDGMENT

N.J. Jamadar, J.—Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the consent of the counsels for the parties, heard finally.

2. The petitioner who is detained under an order dated 2nd March, 2021 passed by the District Magistrate, Pune under section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Dangerous Person, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black-Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) has assailed the legality and correctness of the detention order.

3. The respondent No. 2 invoked the provisions of MPDA Act on the premise that the petitioner was a dangerous person and committing criminal activities by using deadly weapons. The petitioner had created a reign of terror in the jurisdiction of Koregaon Park and Lakshar police stations within the jurisdiction of Commissioner of Police, Pune and Bhigwan police station. The petitioner has allegedly became a perpetual danger to the lives and properties of the people residing and carrying out their daily activities and avocations in the said jurisdiction. It was alleged that the petitioner and his accomplices roamed around armed with deadl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top