SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R. Hanumantharaya – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Krishnakumar S/o. A. R. Parameshwaran – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For The Appellant :P. Prasanna Kumar, Advocate
For The Respondent:Sangamesh G. Patil, Advocate

ORDER

The present petitioner as the accused was tried by the Court of the learned XVIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “the Trial Court”), in Criminal Case No.3800/2016 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “the N.I. Act”) and was convicted for the said offence by its judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 10-04-2017.

Aggrieved by the same, the accused preferred a Criminal Appeal in the Court of the learned LXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-65) at Bengaluru (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “the Sessions Judge’s Court”) in Criminal Appeal No.659/2017.

The appeal was contested by the respondent who was the complainant in the Trial Court. The Sessions Judge’s Court in its order dated 02-01-2019 dismissed the appeal, confirming the judgment of conviction and order on sentence passed by the Trial Court dated 10-04-2017 in C.C.No.3800/2016.

Aggrieved by the said order, the accused has preferred this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top