SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GITA GOPI
Kalabhai Kehabhai Dabhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant :Mr Y J Patel, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr Pranav Trivedi, Advocate.

ORDER

Learned advocate Mr. Pavan Barot submits that he appears on behalf of respondent no.2 – original complainant and seeks permission to file his Vakalatnama. Registry to accept his Vakalatnama.

2. Rule. Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No.1- State and Mr. Pavan Barot, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No.2 – original complainant.

3. The petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “the Cr.P.C.”) seeking quashment of the FIR No. 11211050210258 of 2021 registered with Thangadh Police Station, Surendranagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 506(2) of Indian Penal Code, Section 135 of Gujarat Police Act and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (for short, “the Atrocities Act”) and the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto.

4. Mr. Y.J. Patel, learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the parties have settled the dispute amicably outside the Court and that there remains no grievance between them.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top