SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Mohammad Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:A.Z. Siddiqui, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: G.A.

JUDGMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J.—The present application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the accused applicant seeking bail in anticipation of his imminent arrest in Case Crime No.448 of 2020 under section 67-A, 66-E of the Information Technology Act 2008 and Section 507 IPC, P.S. Thakurganj, District Lucknow.

2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been moved before this Court directly instead of approaching first to Sessions Court, Lucknow because on pandemic situation prevailing due to Covid 19, the work of Sessions Court Lucknow was badly hampered due to several deaths of the employees working in the judgeship.

3. The prosecution story, in brief is that the complainant have virtual acquaintance since past two years with the applicant on Facebook who is working in Mozambique Africa and she had Nikha through Facebook Call on 14.03.2019 which is recognized through the Shia Islamic Laws. When the applicant came back to India, she contacted the applicant and he denied to talk and blocked her mobile number and also from the Facebook. In January 2020, the applicant once again contacted the complainant and when the complainant requested him to take opinion o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top