SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Sandeep K. Shinde, J.
Mohammad Ahmed Ulla – Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Bail Application No.1189 of 2021
Decided on 27.8.2021

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mr. R.V. Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent: Smt. P.P. Shinde, APP

IMPORTANT POINT
Touching cheeks without a sexual intent would not attract offence of ‘sexual assault’ as defined under Section 7 POCSO Act.

Headnote:

Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Section 7 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 438 – Bail – Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in Crime registered at instance of mother of victim for offences punishable under Sections 354 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 8, 9(m), 10 and 12 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Touching cheeks without a sexual intent would not attract offence of ‘sexual assault’, as defined under Section 7 POCSO Act – Primary evaluation of material on record does not suggest, applicant allegedly touched cheeks of victim with a sexual intent – He is in custody since July, 2020 – Case is made out for releasing applicant on bail – Bail granted. (Paras 5, 6 and 7)

Result: Application allowed.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep K. Shinde, J.—Heard.

2. Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in Crime No.438 of 2020 dated 29th July, 2020 registered at the instance of mother of the victim for the offences punishable under Sections 354, of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 8, 9(m), 10 and 12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2021 (‘POCSO’ for short).

3. Applicant is 46 years old person. He runs a chicken centre. Victim at the material time was 8 years old girl. Her mother lodged First Information Report. She stated, applicant touched cheeks of her daughter inside the shop premises, where he was running the business. Whereafter, applicant was arrested. Investigation in the case is over and the final report has been filed.

4. Section 7 of the POCSO Act reads as under:

“7 Whoever with sexual intent touches the vagina, penis, anus, or breast of the child or makes the child touch the vagina, penis, anus, or breast of such person or any other person, or does any other act with sexual intent which involves physical contact without penetration is said to commit sexual assault.”

5. In my view, touching the cheeks without a sexual intent would not attract the offence of ‘sexual assault’, as defined under Section 7 of the POCSO Act. Primary evaluation of the material on record does not suggest, applicant allegedly touched the cheeks of the victim with a sexual intent. He is in custody since July, 2020. Although, the complainant was impleaded as respondent, it appears from the orders passed by the Court that complainant had requested prosecutor to argue on her behalf.

6. In consideration of these facts, in my view, case is made out for releasing the applicant on bail. Hence, the following order:

ORDER

(i) The applicant in Crime No. 438 of 2020 registered with Rabodi Police Station, Thane, he shall be released on executing PR bond for the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in like sum.

7. The application is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

8. It is made clear that observations made here-in-above be construed as expression of opinion for the purpose of bail only and the same shall not in any way influence the trial in other proceedings.

Application allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top