SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Kedar Paswan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the CBI/SPE/Ranchi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ajit Kumar, Senior Advocate
For the C.B.I.:Ms. Nitu Sinha, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.—Heard the parties.

Though this appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.02.2019 passed by learned Special Judge, C.B.I., Ranchi in R.C. No. 02 (A)/ 1997(R), Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the appellant-convict submits that in continuation to the submissions made by him before this court on 16.11.2021 the appellant-convict does not want to contest this appeal on merit and he confines his arguments only to sentence imposed upon the appellant-convict by the trial court in the impugned judgment and order of sentence.

2. By the impugned Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.02.2019 passed by learned Special Judge, C.B.I., Ranchi in R.C. No. 02 (A)/ 1997-R, the learned court has held the appellant-convict guilty for the offences punishable under following offences and had sentenced them as indicated below:-

Sentence

Convict

Offence

Imprisonment

Fine

Default

Kedar

Paswan

2 years R.I.

Paswan

(1) (d) P.C. Act

5 years R.I.

 

Rs. 10 lacs

Rs. 10 lacs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top