SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Savitri Ratho, J.
Manoj Kumar Bhuyan and Ors. – Petitioners
versus
State of Orissa – Opp. Party
BLAPL No.6438 of 2020; BLAPL No.6706 of 2020; BLAPL No. 6520 of 2020; BLAPL No.6624 of 2020
Decided on 15.07.2021

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner in BLAPL No.6438 of 2020:Mr. A.K. Mohapatra, Advocate
For the Petitioner in BLAPL No.6706 of 2020:Mr. L. Mishra, Advocate
For the Petitioner in BLAPL No.6520 of 2020:Mr. V. Mohapatra, Advocate
For the Petitioner in BLAPL No.6624 of 2020:Mr. Binaya Kumar Mohanty, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. G.N. Rout, Addl. Standing Counsel

IMPORTANT POINT
Fulfillment of requirements as enumerated in Section 37 are a pre-requisite before granting bail to accused who is alleged to have committed offences under NDPS Act, involving commercial quantity.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Sections 21 (c) and 29 read with Section 37 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 439 – Bail application – Fulfillment of requirements as enumerated in Section 37 are a pre-requisite before granting bail to accused who is alleged to have committed offences under NDPS Act, involving commercial quantity – In absence of chemical analysis report, it cannot be stated that codeine content in seized cough syrup is beyond prescribed limit as contained in Exception 35, requirements of Section 37 of NDPS Act are not required to be satisfied before granting bail – Prima facie case under Section-21 (c) of NDPS Act is not made out against petitioners – As such, satisfaction of requirements of Section 37 of NDPS Act are not necessary before granting bail – Considering nature of materials available against petitioners and their period of detention in custody and alarming situation prevailing in jails due to overcrowding during continued prevalence of Covid-19, Court inclined to allow prayer for bail of petitioners but however granting liberty to State of Odisha to apply for recall/modification of this order if chemical examination report so warrants – Bail granted. (Paras 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43)

Result: Bail granted.

ORDER

Savitri Ratho, J.—These matters were heard through video conferencing mode.

2. Justice Indira Bannerji in her dissenting opinion in the case of Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in (2021) 4 SCC 1 has observed as follows:

“.... 2. The illicit production, distribution, sale and consumption of drugs and psychotropic substances, is a crime of multi-dimensional magnitude, that imposes a staggering burden on the society. In an Article “Narcotic Aggression and Operation Counter Attack” published in the Mainstream dated March 7, 1992, V.R. Krishna Iyer, J. said:-

“Religion is opium of the people, but today opium is the religion of the people, and like God, is omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient. Alas! Opium makes you slowly ill and eventually kills, makes you a new criminal to rob and buy the stuff, tempts you to smuggle at risk to become rich quick, makes you invisible trafficker of psychotropic substances and operator of a parallel international illicit currency and sub rosa evangelist mafia culture. Drug business makes you if not killed betimes, the possessor of pleasure, power and empire. What noxious menace is this most inescapable evil that benumbs the soul of student, teacher, doctor, politician, artists and professional, and corrupts innocent millions of youth and promising intellectuals everywhere”

3. In the words of Krishna Iyer, J.,

“the global scenario in its sombre macabre, devouring delinquency, is dominated by drug abuse and narcotic trade. Trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances is not any local or regional crime confined only to India and third- world countries, but is a worldwide phenomenon. All nations including India, had huge drug abuse as a threat to the survival of human beings.”

4. Illicit drug trafficking is an organised crime, highly sophisticated and complex. This illicit traffic, cleverly carried out by hardened criminals with dexterity and skill, not only violates national drug laws and international conventions, but also involves many other criminal activities, including racketeering, conspiracy, bribery and corruption of public officials, tax evasion, banking law violations, illegal money transfers, import/export violations, crimes of violence and terrorism.

5. Narcotics are often supplied for money and also in exchange for weapons. There are numerous drug trafficking mafia yielding, immense power in various regions of the world, including India. The far-reaching consequences of illicit drug trade, even threatens the integrity and stability of governments and renders law enforcement action vulnerable.

6. Considering the huge profits derived by drug barons from rampant consumption of opium and other narcotic drugs, tycoons of the drug cartels, who have international links, go to any extent, to exploit and manipulate unhealthy economic conditions, as well as corruption and weaknesses in the administration, to push drugs into the society, in complete disregard of the health, morality and well-being of the people.”….

3. Here is a case, where a case under Section 21 (c) and 29 of the NDPS Act was registered against the four petitioners as 3500 bottles of Eskuf cough syrup allegedly containing codeine were recovered from them, which they allegedly confessed was being taken for drugging purpose. In view of the large quantity of the cough syrup seized, it was the duty of the prosecution to conclude the investigation without leaving any loose ends or lacuna. But although almost one year has elapsed since the case was registered and charge sheet is stated to be filed, neither the chemical analysis report nor any materials in support of the allegation that the petitioners were indulging in sale of the cough syrup for drugging purpose other than recording a confession of two lines that they are guilty, has been produced before this Court.

4. I have heard Mr. Aditya Kumar Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner- Manoj Kumar Bhuyan in BLAPL No. 6438 of 2020, Mr. Lalitendu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top