SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S.AHLUWALIA, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Moolchand – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri A.K. Jain, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Vijay Sundaram, Advocate

JUDGMENT

G.S. Ahluwalia J.—This Criminal Appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgment and sentence dated 13-5-2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Seondha, Distt. Datia in Sessions Trial No. 46/2009 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- with default imprisonment of R.I. for one year.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal in short are that on 11-10-2008, the complainant lodged an F.I.R. that at about 3:30 P.M., he was in the house. His wife was working outside the house whereas the prosecutrix, aged about 1 year was playing on the platform. The appellant came there and took the prosecutrix to his house. After about half an hour, he brought back the prosecutrix and left her on the platform. The prosecutrix was crying and accordingly she was lifted by his wife, and found that her underwear was stained with blood. After removing her underwear, his wife found that blood was oozing out from her private part. At that time, Siyasharan came and informed that he was passing by the house of the appellant and heard the cries of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top