B.S.WALIA
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.S. Walia, J.—Prayer in the petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.41 dated 22.01.2021 registered under Sections 21 and 25, NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Kundli, District Sonipat.
2. Sole argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that although the alleged recovery from the petitioner, co accused Mukdar, Arvind, Vikas all of whom were travelling in a car, is of 523, 394, 20, and 803 grams respectively of powder alleged to be heroin, i.e. commercial quantity, since the petitioner was not informed of his right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate if he so desired, therefore, there was non-compliance with Section 50 NDPS Act, consequentially, the bar under Section 37 NDPS Act would not apply, resultantly the petitioner is entitled to grant of bail during the pendency of the trial.
3. Per contra, Mr. Naveen Sheoran, learned DAG has referred to the notice u/S 50 NDPS Act (Annexure P/4) dated 22.01.2021 to contend that the petitioner was informed, of apprehension of the police that he had some intoxicating material / heroin with him, his rights, besides option to get his sear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.