SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.DASH
Jyoti Prakash Jay Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India (E. D. ) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Bidyalok Mohapatra, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Gopal Agrawal, Advocate, (Enforcement Directorate)

ORDER

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/physical) mode.

2. The Petitioner apprehending his arrest and likely detention in connection with CMC (PMLA) Case No.34 of 2016 on the file of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court, Khurda at Bhubaneswar has filed this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a prayer for his release on bail in the above event.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

I have gone through the averments taken in the application filed by the Petitioner as also the documents annexed thereto. The objection affidavit with the annexed documents and the additional affidavit filed by the Petitioner have also been perused.

4. On registration of Kharavelanagar P.S. Case No.44(4) of 2013, on receipt of an F.I.R. on 07.02.2013, after investigation, charge-sheet was filed on 10.07.2013. Another F.I.R. being received at the same Police Station on 27.05.2013, investigation being made, charge-sheet was also filed on 28.07.2013.

When the matter stood thus, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took up investigation of these cases together with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top