SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.RADHA RANI
Thota Ashok Kumar Venkatanarayana, R. R. Dist. – Appellant
Versus
M. Sridhar Goud, R. R. Dist. Ano – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Padala Pravin Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor TG

ORDER :

Dr. G. Radha Rani, J.—This criminal revision case is preferred by the petitioner/appellant/accused aggrieved by the judgment dated 30-6-2015 in Crl.A. No.55 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of Communal Offence Cases cum VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, questioning the enhancement of sentence i.e. raising the fine amount of Rs.10,000/- to Rs.9,00,000/- in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for 3 months.

2. The case of the revision petitioner - accused in brief was that the 1st respondent filed a private complaint against him for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘NI Act’) alleging that the accused approached the complainant for a hand loan of Rs.9,00,000/- on 15-12-2007 and the complainant advanced the said amount, the accused executed an undertaking letter promising to repay the money within 3 months, but failed to repay the said amount and dodged the matter on one pretext or other. On repeated demands the accused issued a cheque bearing no 186962 dated 25-11-2009 for Rs.9,00,000/- drawn on Dena Bank, Saroor Nagar branch, Hyderabad towards discharge of legally enfo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top