SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.LAKSHMAN
State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Kodudula Yellappa Ravi Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Public Prosecutor TG

ORDER

K. Lakshman, J.—This revision is filed to set aside the order dated 12.01.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No.163 of 2021 in S.C.No.878 of 2021 by the I Special Sessions Jude for Trial of Cases relating to Atrocities against Women–cum–XVII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy district at L.B. Nagar.

2. Heard learned Public Prosecutor for the petitioner/State. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent/accused.

3. Perusal of the record would reveal that the respondent herein is sole accused in S.C.No.878 of 2021. The offences alleged against the accused are under sections 302, 376, 379 and 201 of IPC. The accused had filed a petition under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. vide Crl.M.P.No.163 of 2021 in S.C.No.878 of 2021 seeking to recall P.Ws.1, 2, 4, 5 and 11 on the ground that he is Under Trial Prisoner. Therefore, he could not give proper instructions to his counsel at the time of cross-examination of said prosecution witnesses. Therefore, his counsel could not elicit certain important facts from the above said witnesses during the cross-examination. Therefore, on the said grounds, the accused sought to recall the said prosecution witnes

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top