SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NAVNEET KUMAR
Gangiya Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P.

ORDER

Navneet Kumar, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 01.07.2004 passed by the learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 261 of 2001 whereby the learned trial court after finding the guilt of the accused persons for the offence punishable u/s 498-A of IPC, convicted and sentenced them to undergo S.I. for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 100/- each and in default of payment of fine they were directed to undergo for SI for one month.

2. The prosecutions story arose in the wake of fardbeyan of one Sanichar Yadav (P.W.7), the father of the deceased. The statement was recorded by S.I. of Bakratha Police Station in the District of Hazaribagh on 13.08.2000 at 11.30 hours. The statement of Sanichar Yadav, the informant, is as follows:

That the daughter Suma Devi of the informant got married with Baijanath (not made accused) 9 yrs ago and thereafter she was kept two years properly in her matrimonial house, later on her in-laws people Gangiya Devi (appellant no.1), Gobardhan (deceased appellant died during the pendency of the appeal and his name was deleted after abatement) and husband’s younger

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top