JUDGMENT (ORAL)

V.M. Deshpande, J.—Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Heard Shri Firdos Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.

3. Though very attractive arguments were made by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court, closure scrutiny of the entire case of the prosecution, which is presented before this Court in reply, we are of the view that the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner needs to be rejected.

4. This case has a genesis of how parents are desperate to see that their progeny/child/ward is admitted in professional course like medicines and for that there can be allurement by the sharks which are having a free swing in the society and they always look for their pray and such parents are the easiest one.

5. An offence was registered with Police Station, Ajni, Nagpur by one Dr. Shilpa Suresh Dhekle, a Medical Practitioner at Pune. She was very much interested to see that her daughter is admitted in medical course. Since, the challenge in this writ petition is only in respect