SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Nirmala Second Bail – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Naresh Chandra and Paltoo Ram Gupta, Advocates
For the Opp. Party: G.A.

ORDER

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.—Heard Sri. P.R. Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kiran Singh, learned A.G.A.

2. This is the second bail application. First bail application was rejected on 18.3.2021 by Hon’ble Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, J. vide Bail No. 3356 of 2021.

3. In view of the order of Hon’ble the Chief Justice dated 13.11.2018, if the Hon’ble Court, which has rejected the bail application of an accused, is not sitting at the place where subsequent bail application has been filed, the same shall be put up before the regular Court, therefore, this bail application has been put up before the regular Court. It has been noted that the Hon’ble Court, which has rejected the first bail application, is presently not sitting at Lucknow where this second bail application has been filed.

4. As per Sri. Gupta, the present applicant, who is a lady, is in jail since 24.11.2020 in Case Crime No. 0206 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 302/34, 336 & 506 IPC, Police Station? Asoha, District? Unnao.

5. Sri. Gupta has submitted that he is conscious about the fact that he cannot raise any arguments or take any ground in the second bail application, which could have been taken in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top