SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Vijay Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Revisionist:Ram Prakash Singh and Vivek Kumar, Advocates
For the Opp. Parties: G.A.

JUDGMENT

Subhash Vidyarthi, J.—Heard Sri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ram Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Tilak Raj Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents and perused the record.

2. The instant revision under Sections 397/401 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been filed by the accused-revisionist seeking to challenge the validity of the order dated 27.05.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gonda in Sessions Trial No. 338 of 2022 (State vs. Vijay Mishra & Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 90 of 2019, under Sections 323, 325, 308 I.P.C., Police Station-Umari Begumganj, District- Gonda whereby the application under Section 228(1)(a) of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the accused-revisionist for transferring the case to the Court of Magistrate, has been rejected.

3. The aforesaid case has been instituted on the basis of an F.I.R. alleging that the four named accused persons, including the revisionist, had assaulted the informant’s brother with sticks, because of which he fell unconscious. The injured was taken to the police station while he was still unconscious. On these allegations, the F.I.R. was registered i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top