SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHAN LAL
Rajit Kumar Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sh. Anmol Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sh. Amit Gupta AAG

ORDER

Petitioner/accused has sought regular bail in FIR No. 29/2017 of police station Gangyal Jammu for commission of offences contrary to sections 8/21/22 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act 1985 (for short the NDPS Act). It is averred, the trial of petitioner is pending before the court of Ld. 1st Addl. Session Judge Jammu where the petitioner moved bail application, but in a casual manner bail has been denied to petitioner/accused and the said bail order is suffering from vice of non-application of mind by the trial court which has dealt with the liberty of petitioner in a mechanical manner, the charge sheet against the petitioner contained 10 witnesses and the prosecution has examined all material witnesses, the prevailing circumstances make it almost unforeseeable to comprehend the conclusion of trial in the new feature, the long incarceration of the petitioner in jail is resulting in financial physical and mental torture to him as each and every hour is a nightmare from hell for the petitioner who is in custody since 2017 however co-accused Ashok Singh has already been granted bail. It is averred, that the allegations against petitioner are, that a docket was sen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top