SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Mandava Ramesh Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
Boddu Kranthi Kumar Vijayawada – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’), assailing the judgment dated 21.03.2017 passed in Criminal Appeal No.35 of 2016 by the learned VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, whereby and whereunder the judgment dated 28.01.2016 passed in C.C.No.674 of 2015 by the learned II Special Magistrate, Vijayawada convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was confirmed.

2. The Criminal Revision Petitioner was the accused and the 1st respondent was the complainant in C.C.No.674 of 2015. The trial court convicted the accused and assailing the same he had preferred Criminal appeal and the same having been dismissed, he preferred this Criminal Revision Case.

3. For sake of convenience, the parties, hereinafter will be referred to with their status in C.C.No.674 of 2015, i.e. to say the 1st respondent herein will be referred to as, ‘the complainant’ and the criminal revision petitioner will be referred to as, ‘the accused’.

4. The complainant filed a complaint under Sections 190 and 200 of Cr.P.C. to punish the accused for the offence u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top