SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANISH DAYAL
Yashovardhan Birla – Appellant
Versus
Cecil Webber Engineering Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sidhartha Agarwal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Smriti and Mr. Jaiveer Kant, Advocates
For the Respondents:Ms. Anupama Kaul, Advocate for R-2

JUDGMENT

This petition has been filed seeking quashing of complaint qua the petitioner, being C.C. No.515453/2016 P.S. Rajendra Nagar pending in the court of Ld. MM, Tis Hazari Court, New Delhi and for setting aside order dated 6th July, 2017 by which Crl. Rev. No.219/2017 filed by petitioner was dismissed by the Ld. Special Judge (PC Act), CBI-08, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, New Delhi.

2. The said complaint was filed under section 138 read with section 141 & 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the principal accused M/s Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd. (A-l) an incorporated company with its registered office at Mumbai. Its Managing Director, Mr. P.V.R. Murthy, who is also a signatory to the cheque in question, has been arrayed as A-2 while the Directors of A-1, who are stated to be in charge and responsible for the conduct of day-to-day affairs of the accused company, have been arrayed as A-3 to A-8. The gravamen of the complaint was that the accused company had approached the complainant company (M/s. Cecil Webber Engineering Ltd.) for advancement of a business loan of Rs.5 crores as an Inter Corporate Deposit (ICD). The said loan was advanced on mutually agree

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top