Lovepreet Singh VS State of Rajasthan, Through PP

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

FARJAND ALI
Lovepreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Mehar, P.P.

ORDER

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioners. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:—

S. No.	Particulars of the Case
1.	FIR Number	56/2023
2.	Concerned Police Station	Hanumangarh
3.	District	G.R.P. Jodhpur
4.	Offences alleged in the FIR	Under Sections 153-A, 153-B and 505 of IPC
5.	Offences added, if any	Under Sections 10(A) and 13(1)(A) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Section 66-F IT Act.
6.	Date of passing of impugned order	01.02.2024

2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioners that no case for the alleged offences is made out against them and their incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioners and they have been made accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

FARJAND ALILovepreet Singh – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent

FARJAND ALI
Lovepreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent