Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
K. Suresh Reddy and A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ.
Gogula Venkatesh – Apellant
versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respodent
Criminal Appeal No.2563/2018 and
Criminal Appeal No.2563 of 2018
Decided on 9.4.2026
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: A Gayatri Reddy
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (AP)
IMPORTANT POINT
Cruelty and murder – Conviction for murder cannot be sustained where homicidal nature of death of deceased itself is in serious dispute.
Headnote:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 498-A and 302 – Cruelty and murder – Life imprisonment – Homicidal nature of death is in serious dispute and dying declaration recorded by Magistrate is not supporting the same – Conduct of accused subsequent to incident, must be considered in assessing conduct and intention of accused – There exists reasonable doubt as to whether accused has committed murder of deceased, particularly when homicidal nature of death itself is not established – Available circumstances are, accused and deceased living together, quarrel between them and suicidal death of deceased – Conviction and sentence set aside. (Paras 33, 35, 37 and 38)
Result: Criminal Appeals allowed.
JUDGMENT
Introductory:
A. Hari Haranadha Sharma, J.—[i] Sole accused in Sessions Case No.340 of 2015 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Anantapuramu, (for short referred as ‘the Sessions Court’) is the appellant.
[ii] He was tried by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Anantapuram for the charges under Sections 498-A IPC and 302 IPC.
2. State represented by the Inspector of Police, Nallamada Circle filed Charge Sheet against the appellant/accused, alleging commission of offences under Sections 498-A on the ground of subjecting his wife to physical and mental cruelty, and under Section 302 IPC for causing death of his wife by pouring kerosene and setting fire.
3. The Sessions Court found the appellant/accused guilty for the offence under Section 302-IPC and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default to pay fine amount to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one year and acquitted him for the charge under Section 498-A IPC under the judgment dated 01.03.2017. Questioning the propriety and sustainability of the conviction and sentence, the present appeal is filed.
Case of the prosecution:-
4. [i] PW1-D. Lakshmi Devi, PW.6-D. Shankar are the parents of one G. Nagendramma (herein after referred to ‘as the deceased’). The accused is the husband of the deceased.
[ii] During their wedlock, the accused and the deceased were blessed with a son by name Mohan. Accused addicted to alcohol etc., and used to harass the deceased physically and mentally, on that count the deceased came to her parental home along with her son. But four days prior to the incident, accused asked the deceased to come to home stating that if she does not come, he will commit suicide. Then, PW.1 and PW.6 taken the deceased to the house of the accused and left her there, asking the accused to take care of her.
[iii] On 07.05.2014 at about 10.00p.m., the accused consumed alcohol and beat the deceased indiscriminately, when she tried to come out of the house of the accused, he caught hold of the deceased, poured kerosene on her body and set ablaze. On hearing cries, PW.2 and others came there, then the accused poured water on the deceased and put off the flames. Son of the deceased was also stained with kerosene but he has escaped from the house.
[iv] The deceased was shifted to Government Area Hospital, Kadiri in 108 ambulance van as the condition was critical. PW.9-Doctor, sent medical intimation to the local Magistrate, immediately.
[v] PW.11- The Judicial First Class Magistrate came to the Hospital, recorded the statement of the victim/injured, marked as Ex.P15 and obtained Ex.P8 and P9-Certificates from the Doctor as to the mental condition of the patient.
[vi] On receipt of medico legal information, on 07.05.2014 mid night PW.12 recorded the statement of injured/deceased vide Ex.P11. He has obtained the endorsement of Doctor as to coherent condition of the victim injured. Ex.P16 is the endorsement of the duty doctor.
[vii] On the strength of Ex.P11-statement of the victim, PW.10 registered FIR in Crime No.125 of 2014 for the offences under Sections 498-A, 307 IPC vide Ex.P12, and he came to know that the victim /injured was shifted to Ruya Hospital, Tirupati. He went there and recorded her statement under Ex.P13. Thereafter, PW.10 has visited the scene of offence, prepared rough sketch of scene of offence under Ex.P14.
[viii] The deceased died on 12.5.2014 while she was bringing back to the village, when the Doctors declared that her survival is difficult. The corpse was brought to the Government Hospital, Kadiri. The matter was informed to Police. PW.1 submitted Ex.P1- report. On the strength of the same, the section of law was altered to Section 498-A, 302 IPC by PW13 and the altered FIR is Ex.P17.
[ix] Further investigation is done by PW14. He has secured the inquest Panchayatdars – PW3, PW4, PW5 and held inquest over the dead body of the deceased at Government G
