SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.DANI
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Swati Girish Bhinde – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner: K.G. Navandar.
For the Respondents: P.R. Patil & S.B. Bhapkar.

JUDGMENT

S.S. Dani, J. - These four revision petitions are being decided and disposed of by this common judgment, in as much as, they involve common questions of law and facts.

2. Criminal Revision Application No. 243 of 1991 is filed against the order dated 5.1.1991 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner in Criminal Revision Application No. 59 of 1990 quashing the issuance of process under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the present respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Criminal Revision Application No. 224 is also directed against the order dated 5.1.1991 passed by the same Court in Criminal Revision Application No. 57 of 1990 quashing the similar issuance of process. In these two criminal revision applications present petitioner Omprakash is the original complainant, while the present respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are the original accused persons.

3. Criminal Revision Application No. 245 of 1991 is directed against the order dated 5.1.1991 passed by the same Court in Criminal Revision Application No. 58 of 1990, while the remaining Criminal Revision Application No. 246 of 1991 is against the order of the same Court of the same date in Criminal Revision Application













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top