SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRATAP SINGH
Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner - Mr. A. Ramesh.
For the Respondent - Mr. K. Ravichandra Babu.

ORDER

Pratap Singh, J. - The accused in C.C. No. 894 of 1991 on the file of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Said a pet, Madras has filed this petition, under section 482, Cr. P.C., praying to call for the records in the aforesaid C.C. No. 894/91 and quash the same.

2. The respondent has filed the private complaint against the petitioner arraying him as the accused. The allegations in it are briefly as follows:

The accused wanted certain amount as hand loan. The complainant agreed and gave hand loan. The accused promised to return the borrowed amount in stages and parted the postdated cheques. One of the cheques, dated 24th December, 1990, issued by the accused for Rs. 36,250 was presented for encashment on 11th January, 1991. It. was returned the an endorsement 'account closed' the a bank memo, dated 18th January, 1991. The complainant sent notice through lawyer on 19th January, 1991 to the accused by registered post the acknowledgment due. It was returned the an endorsement 'not found' at delivery time. The accused had deliberately evaded receipt of the registered notice. Hence the complaint.

3. The petitioner seeks to quash this complaint.

4. Mr. A. Ramesh, the learned counsel appearin















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top