PRATAP SINGH
Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
Pratap Singh, J. - The accused in C.C. No. 894 of 1991 on the file of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Said a pet, Madras has filed this petition, under section 482, Cr. P.C., praying to call for the records in the aforesaid C.C. No. 894/91 and quash the same.
2. The respondent has filed the private complaint against the petitioner arraying him as the accused. The allegations in it are briefly as follows:
The accused wanted certain amount as hand loan. The complainant agreed and gave hand loan. The accused promised to return the borrowed amount in stages and parted the postdated cheques. One of the cheques, dated 24th December, 1990, issued by the accused for Rs. 36,250 was presented for encashment on 11th January, 1991. It. was returned the an endorsement 'account closed' the a bank memo, dated 18th January, 1991. The complainant sent notice through lawyer on 19th January, 1991 to the accused by registered post the acknowledgment due. It was returned the an endorsement 'not found' at delivery time. The accused had deliberately evaded receipt of the registered notice. Hence the complaint.
3. The petitioner seeks to quash this complaint.
4. Mr. A. Ramesh, the learned counsel appearin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.