SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE
Ancon Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Amitava Goswami – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Gitesh Ranian Bhattacharya, J. - A question of interpretation of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has been raised in this revisional application. The petitioner No. 2 as Director of the petitioner No: 1 Company issued the four cheques towards the discharge of their liabilities against the dues of the opposite party complainant.

The total amount under those four cheques was Rs. 36,842/-. Those were however all postdated cheques. The first three cheques were presented to the Bank on 13th June, 1992 but they were returned unpaid by the drawee bank with the remark 'funds insufficient'. The cheques were again presented to the bank on 10th July, 1992 but this time also they were dishonoured by the bank. On 13th July, 1992 the complainant payee received a letter dated the 7th July, 1992 containing a request of the drawer of the cheques to hold the cheques for the time being. On 14th July, 1992 the complainant payee issued notice to the drawer of the cheques demanding payment of the said aggregate/amount of the cheques, i.e. Rs. 36,842/and the said notice was duly received by the drawer of the cheques on the 16th of July, 1992. On 28th July, 1992 the drawer of the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top