SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.RANGA REDDY
Taher N. Khambati – Appellant
Versus
Vinayak Enterprises – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant: P.M. Gopal Rao.
For the Respondents: V.V. Ramanadham.

JUDGMENT

M. Ranga Reddy, J. - This is an appeal filed by the complainant in C.C. No. 286 of 1991 on the file of XI Metropoliton Magistrate, Secunderabad acquitting respondents 1 and 2 of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The case of the appellant as disclosed from the complaint filed by him is in brief as follows:

The respondents 1 and 2 borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,00,900/- from the appellant for purpose of their business promising to repay the same within a short time. Respondents 1 and 2 became liable in a sum of Rs. 1,18,337/- in respect of the said transaction and issued a cheque drawn on 'Karor Vysya Bank' Rashtrapathi Road, Secunderabad for the said amount with an understanding to present the said cheque on 15-1-1991.

3. The appellant complainant presented the said cheque on 15-1-1991 but it was returned for want of sufficient funds. The appellant then contacted the respondents on telephone and demanded for payment of the amount for which the cheque was issued. Then the respondents promised to arrange for payment in a short time. So, the appellant waited for two months and again presented the cheque for encashment on 19-3-1991, but it was again returned














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top