SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.H.N.KURANGA
Azizabi – Appellant
Versus
St. Mother Oil Mills, Channamanglam (Kerala) – Respondent


ORDER

K.H.N. Kuranga, J. - The question raised in these two petitions are similar. Hence, these two petitions are disposed of by this common order.

2. The petitioners have in these petitions prayed for quashing of the complaints filed by the first-respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the me of the Judicial class Magistrate Court-II, Kochi in c.c. No. 826 of 1995 and 827 of 1995 and all further proceedings pursuant to the said complaints insofar as they relate to the petitioners who are accused 3 and 4 respectively in the said cases.

3. The office has raised an objection as to how these criminal petitions under Section 482, Cr. P.C., are maintainable, seeking relief of quashing of the complaints and further proceedings in the aforementioned cases on the file of the Judicial-Magistrate Court-II, Kochi, which is situate in Kerala State and does not come within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.

These two petitions are posted for orders on the office objection.

4. Sri Sampath Anand shetty and Sri Basavaprabhu Patil, learned Counsels for the petitioners contended that the words used, namely, to prevent abuse of the process of any Court, in Section 482, Cr. P







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top