SAROJNEI SAXENA
Mahabir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chandan Manerjee – Respondent
Dr. (Mrs.) Sarojnei Saksena, J. - The petitioner has filed this petition under section 482, Cr. P.C. to quash the complaint filed against him under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and under section 420 IPC, in which summoning order has also been passed against him on October 12, 1989.
2.The respondent-complainant filed a complaint against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner purchased goods from the respondent and issued two post-dated cheques dated 12.4.1989 for Rs. 30,000/- and dated 8.6.1989 for Rs 3. 33,051.94. The petitioner also executed an agreement in favour of the respondent. When these cheques we're presented in the bank for encashment they were bounced by the bank and the remark given was "Refer to drawer". The respondent gave a notice to the petitioner to make the payment, but despite this when no payment was made he filed the complaint against the petitioner on July 18, 1989. After recording preliminary evidence, the trial Magistrate passed the impugned summoning order.
3. The petitioner's learned counsel contended that no notice was given to the petitioner regarding cheque dated June 8, 1989, for Rs. 33,051,94, when it was dishonoured by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.