SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, S.KRISHNAN UNNI
Swamalatha – Appellant
Versus
Chandramohan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant:T.A. Ramadasan. For the Respondent: Gratious Kuriakose.

JUDGMENT

K.G. Balakrishnan, J. - This is an appeal filed by the complainant in C.C. No. 698 of 1991 on the file of J.F.C.M. I, Kannur against the acquittal of the respondent. The complaint was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and it was alleged that the respondent had drawn three cheques in favor of the complainant and when they were presented for payment, they were dishonored and thus the respondent committed the offence under the Act. When this appeal came up for hearing before the learned Single Judge, question arose as to whether a single complaint could be filed in respect of three cheques. The learned Single Judge disagreed with the view expressed in Crl. R.P. No. 734 of 19941, and was pleased to refer the matter to a Division Bench.

2. We heard the appellant's counsel and also the counsel for the respondent. The respondent herein was acquitted on the ground that complaint was barred by time. The Magistrate held that as per Section 138(c), the complaint should have been filed within 15 days of the receipt of the notice by the accused.

3. At the outset we may state that the view taken by the Magistrate is incorrect and contrary to the provisions of law. O










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top