S.S.NIJJAR
Suresh Srinivasan Iyengar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Mention of words "along with accrued interest" with amount mentioned in dishonoured cheque will not render demand vague and illegal for prosecution of complaint u/ s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
JUDGMENT
S.S Nijjar, J. - This order will dispose of Criminal Writ Petition Nos. 12/98, 13/98, 14/98, 15/98, 16/98, 17/98, 18/98, 29/98, 30/98, 31/98, 32/98, 33/98, 34/98 and 35/98 as there is commonality of facts, parties and points of law in all the matters. For the sake of convenience the facts have been taken from Criminal Writ Petition No. 12 of 1998.
2. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal procedure Code has been filed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 16th May. 1997 passed by the Additional Chief Metropoliton Magistrate's 4th Court. Girgaum, Bombay in C.C. No. 297/S/96 whereby the application filed by the petitioner for dropping the proceeding has been rejected. Briefly the relevant facts may be noted.
3. The petitioner claims to be the non-Executive Director of the Company known as M/s. Jay Harsh Holding and Services Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at Borivli (West), Mumbai. hereinafter referred to as Respondent No. 3 The Responden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.