SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.NIJJAR
Suresh Srinivasan Iyengar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


IMPORTANT POINT

Mention of words "along with accrued interest" with amount mentioned in dishonoured cheque will not render demand vague and illegal for prosecution of complaint u/ s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

JUDGMENT

S.S Nijjar, J. - This order will dispose of Criminal Writ Petition Nos. 12/98, 13/98, 14/98, 15/98, 16/98, 17/98, 18/98, 29/98, 30/98, 31/98, 32/98, 33/98, 34/98 and 35/98 as there is commonality of facts, parties and points of law in all the matters. For the sake of convenience the facts have been taken from Criminal Writ Petition No. 12 of 1998.

2. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal procedure Code has been filed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 16th May. 1997 passed by the Additional Chief Metropoliton Magistrate's 4th Court. Girgaum, Bombay in C.C. No. 297/S/96 whereby the application filed by the petitioner for dropping the proceeding has been rejected. Briefly the relevant facts may be noted.

3. The petitioner claims to be the non-Executive Director of the Company known as M/s. Jay Harsh Holding and Services Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at Borivli (West), Mumbai. hereinafter referred to as Respondent No. 3 The Responden




















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top