A.K. Trivedi, J. - The above referred to both the matters are filed by the same petitioners against the same respondents and as such both the matters being cognate are heard together and are being disposed of by this Common order.

2. Shri K.J. Kakkad, learned Advocate appears on behalf of the petitioners in both the matters while Mr. Y.N. Ravani learned Advocate appears for respondent No. 2 in both the matters. Learned A.P.P. Mrs. B.R. Gajjar appears for respondent No. 1 in both the matters.

3. Rule, Learned Advocates for respective parties waives service of rule.

4. The petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mansa. District Mehsana. That in the proceedings of Criminal Revision Applications No. 10/98 an impugned order is passed in the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 428/95 while in the proceedings of Criminal Revision Application No. 11/98, the impugned order is passed in the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 43/96.

5. The respondent No. 2 of the respective matters has prosecuted present petitioner by filing above stated criminal proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. That lea