SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.V.SANKARANARAYANAN
Kamalam – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER

K.V. Sankaranarayanan, J. - C.C. No. 190/96 on the file of the Munsiff Magistrate south, Paravoor is a case instituted on a complaint by the 2nd respondent alleging an offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner had entered appearance and had been released on bail in February, 1997 itself. The complainant was examined as P.W.1 as early as on 193-1998. On that day, she prayed for time for cross-examination of the witness. The prayer was granted on condition that she will pay a cost of Rs. 150/-. Thereafter, the case underwent a number of adjournments all at the instance of the petitioner/accused person. The petitioner filed Crl. M.P. No. 3316/98 praying for an opportunity to cross examine the complainant. When it came up on 22-10-1998, the-junior Counsel expressed inability to cross-examine the complainant. It appears that the senior Counsel was not present. So noting this, the learned Magistrate dismissed the application. Thereafter, the case has been adjourned a number of times. It is seen from the last of the orders that the case was taken for orders and is now being adjourned as she did not appear later and a warrant has also been issued against he






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top