SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.L.DAVE
M. Sivakami () – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Ginning and Oil Mill Factory – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.L. Dave. J. - Rule. Mr. Mehul Shah, learned Advocate for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Maulin Rawal, learned APP and Mr. S.P. Dave, learned APP for respondent No. 2 waive service of (Para 4) rule. This group of petitions arises out of order that came to be passed by the learned JMFC. Wankaner in respect of the application given by the present petitioner to quash the proceedings and discharge the petitioner who is one of the accused persons in the respective complaints, which came to be filed by respondent No. 1 herein viz., Bharat Ginning and Oil Mill Factory and Jalaram Industries respective petitions, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The said application was rejected and hence the petition.

2. The quashing of complaint is sought in exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. by the original accused No. 5 the present petitioner on the ground that she is only a Director of the accused Company and not involved in the day-to-day affairs of the Company and she cannot be considered as "person in charge of or responsible to the Company for conduct of the business of the Company as contemplated under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It is f















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top