SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, M.B.SHAH
Cranex Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nagarjuna Finance Ltd. & Anr. – Respondent


Order

Leave granted.

2. The case involves a settlement of the money claim during the pend­ency of a criminal appeal arising out of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The main appeal, namely, Criminal Appeal No. 59/99, against the conviction is pending before the VIth Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad in the matter arising under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. That is an appeal against the order dated 8.2.99 of the XVth Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, sentencing the appellant No. 2, representing the firm, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and further to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- or in default, to ­undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of 3 months. There is also a direc­tion against the 2nd appellant representing the 1st appellant Company, to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- or in default to undergo simple impris­onment for 3 months. The appeal against the conviction and sentence is pending as aforesaid, before the VIth Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad.

3. At that stage, it appears that some ­interlocutory applications were filed by the ­appellants in the trial Court and the said a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top