SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI, B.N.AGRAWAL
Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jayaswals NECO Limited – Respondent


Judgment

Sethi, J.—Leave granted.

2. (a) What is meant by, “the bank” as mentioned in Clause (a) of the proviso to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

(b) Does such bank mean the bank of the drawer of the cheque or covers within its ambit any bank including the collect­ing bank of the Payee of the cheque?

(c) To which bank the cheque is to be presented for the purposes of attracting the penal provisions of Section 138 of the Act?

are the questions to be determined by this Court in this appeal.

3. Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Om Prakash v. Gurcharan Singh1 and Gujarat High Court in Arunbhai Nilkantharai Nanavati v. Jayaben Prahladbhai through Her Power of Attorney & Anr.2 have held that a cheque must be presented to the bank on which it is drawn within six months from the date of issue of the cheque. However, Madras High Court in A.B.K. Publications Ltd. & Ors. v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd.3 has taken the view that cheque can be presented either in the payee’s bank or in the drawer bank and the date of presentation in respective banks will be reckoned for calculating period of six months from the date it was drawn.

4. In the present case












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top