SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.C.PANDEY
Jitendra Singh Flora – Appellant
Versus
Ravikant Talwar – Respondent


ORDER

S.C. Pandey, J.- This revision is directed against the order dated 25-101999 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Jabalpur in Criminal Case No. 814/1999.

2. The non-applicant Ravikant Talwar filed a complaint against the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 (henceforth 'the Act). The non-applicant alleged in his complaint that he is the holder of power of attorney of one Shri Shashikant Talwar. The applicant and the complainant entered into two agreements dated 8.-5-1990 and 10-5-1992. whereby the applicant was required to construct building No. 183. A.P.R. Colony. Katanga. Jabalpur. Pursuant to the aforesaid agreements it is alleged that the non-applicant advanced Rs. 2.70.000/- to the applicant. It was agreed that the work of construction of above mentioned house shall be over by 30-8-1992. It is alleged in the complaint that the applicant was not able to deliver the completed building by 30-8-1992 and. therefore the non-applicant agreed to extend the time till 30-4-1993. It is alleged in the complaint that pursuits to the aforesaid agreements three post-dated cheques dated 30-4-1993 were issued by the applicant in favour of the non-appl





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top