SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

T.S.DOABIA
Poonam Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal Swara & Anr. – Respondent


Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ajay Vaid, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. C.M. Gupta and Mr. L.K. Sharma, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

T.S. Doabia, J.— The short sub-mission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that criminal procee-dings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can not be taken against her, as cheques were issued by another partner of the firm.

It is submitted that she is a sleeping partner and as such, she cannot be made liable. Section 141 of the Nego-tiable Instrument Act is relevant and is being reproduced below:—

“Section 141 of Negotiable Instru-ment Act provides for offences by companies which reads as under; (1) If the person Committing an offence under Section 138 is a company every person who, at the time the offence was committed was in charge of, and was res-ponsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company as well as the company, shall be deemed to guilty of the offence and shall liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. ”

2. A perusal of the above provi-sion makes it apparent that where an offence is committed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, then every person who is incharge of the business of the company for the conduct of the business of the company as well as the company would be deeme





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top