SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.D.V.REDDY
Gurram Subbarayudu (Died) Gurram Subbamma – Appellant
Versus
Moto Pothula Narasimham (Died) Garre Venkaiah – Respondent


A. D. V. REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE only point that arises for the consideration in this appeal is whether in a suit by a transferee of a pronote for recovery of monies due on the pronote executed by the managing partner of a firm, the others partners of the firm can be made liable.

( 2 ) ONE Palwadi Hanumantharao the 2nd defendant for an on behalf of the firm palwadi Hanumaiah Son and Co. , executed a pronote Exhibit A-2 in renewal of prior pronotes evidenced by Exhibits X-1 to X-3 for Rs. 1,000. 00 on 1-8-1949 in favour of 1st defendant. The 1st defendant transferred this pronote by an endorsement Exhibit A-1 for consideration in favour of the plaintiff on 20-5-1961 and the endorsee has filed the suit claiming the money due against the partners of the firm of Hanumaiah Son and Company, defendants 2 to 5. While the 2nd defendant the managing partner of the firm, in his written statement admitted the execution of the promissory note as a partner of the firm of P. Hanumaiah son and Company and passing of the consideration thereunder , defendants 3 to 5 , the other partners in their written statement contended that the 2nd defendant was not the managing partner of the firm and the firm itsel








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top